PureVPN Vs HideMyAss VPN Comparison 2020

Both (PureVPN Vs HideMyAss) offers a good list of advanced features. This gives users the ability to leverage better anonymity/security when exploring the internet.

With either provider, you have dedicated apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Fire TV, Android/Apple TVs.

Albeit, PureVPN gains an edge over HMA VPN by offering a native add-on for Kodi. Not to mention, the provider even offers manual setup guides and preconfigured routers.

In terms of simultaneous connections, both services support multi logins on 5 devices only. However, the setting up of apps is quite easy and uncomplicated.

As far as extra features are concerned, PureVPN offers NAT Firewall, Split Tunneling, Ad/Tracker blocking, IPv6 Leak Protection, Port Forwarding, DDoS Protection, and dedicated IPs.

Lots of review websites and the provider itself claims that HMA works for unblocking streaming platforms and bypassing geographical restrictions or VPN bans.

Nothing could be further from the truth, as my tests on their servers revealed that none of them work smoothly for unblocking popular VoDs in the marketplace.

PureVPN, on the other hand, was way more successful in bypassing geo-restrictions on Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Voot, Hotstar, and even Disney Plus.

All of its apps come equipped with a “popular websites” menu that lists all famous streaming platforms like the ones above. Simply click on the icon of the service you want to unblock. You can also stream your best-pick movies on BBC iPlayer using PureVPN.

The best part of all: this menu is also available on Chrome and Mozilla and allows users to unblock even Netflix directly from within the browser!

China

China does not take blocking VPNs lightly and “The Great Firewall” employs numerous technologies and algorithms for stopping residents/expats from using one.

Sadly, HMA VPN fails at offering any benefits to either audience. The UK-based provider does not provide access to a mirror website, neither does it have Chinese servers.

PureVPN, on the other hand, works for both: those wanting a VPN to China for accessing local content and those in the country, who need a working VPN.

The provider is the only name in the industry offering 12 Chinese servers (6 in Beijing and 6 in Shanghai). At the same time, it offers apps that work in the country.

Albeit, currently the list is only limited to Windows, macOS, and Android. This is still quite an achievement, nevertheless, as many VPNs fail at providing access in China!

PureVPN is among the few providers in the marketplace that supports almost all platforms/devices, including Xbox One, PS4, Nvidia Shield, and even Nintendo Switch.

In terms of the user interface, their apps are quite easy-to-use and intuitive, catering to both: rookie and tech-y VPN users, boasting a neat and clean design.

As an added incentive, PureVPN’s app even has a port changing option, which assists in bypassing geo-restrictions and VPN bans in countries with tough laws.

The mobile apps also have the same set of features but tend to be different in appearance. They boast a darker design and UI, but one that is incredibly user-friendly.

As compared to PureVPN, the infamous HMA VPN boasts a broader interface and styling. Their app covers at least half of the screen on desktops/laptops.

As such, it cannot exactly be considered user-friendly. The best apps feature a minimalistic design but meet all aspects of ease-of-use, which is not available with HMA.

There is not much visible difference between the desktop/laptop and smartphone applications, as their color theme, accessibility, and navigations are pretty much identical.

Just the size of the VPN clients varies device-to-device and platform-to-platform. For instance, the browser extensions boast a more minimalistic appearance.

As compared to PureVPN, the UK-based HMA VPN offers more in “server countries”. In fact, their network infrastructure is among the largest.

You have access to 1000+ servers in over 190 countries worldwide. This high server count results in even distribution of users on different servers.

PureVPN, on the other hand, boasts more in the way of “server count”. It has 2,000+ servers in 140+ countries worldwide, which is quite an achievement.

To get a better idea of the performance of both providers, I conducted a speed analysis. This process required the testing of different servers from both providers on a myriad of aspects.

In bare speed tests on a 100 Mbps connection, PureVPN managed to deliver an average of 91 Mbps in uploads and downloads, indicating a speed loss of 9%.

HMA VPN, on the other hand, delivered mediocre speed averaging at 70.72 Mbps. This indicates a speed loss of over 29.28%, which is not suitable for any VPN user!

PureVPN supports a great variety of protocols. These include PPTP, L2TP, IKEv2, SSTP, and OpenVPN (TCP and UDP) to give users of all kinds of freedom of choice.

As default though, PureVPN deploys the OpenVPN protocol on all devices, with the exception of iOS devices that use the IKEv2 protocol for faster speeds and security.

For encryption, the provider utilizes AES-256-CBC cipher with HMAC SHA1 hash authentication for the data channel, which is quite impressive and highly-secure.

Meanwhile, it deploys the AES-256-CBC cipher with HMAC SHA384 hash authentication and RSA-4096 handshake encryption for the control channel.

HMA VPN, on the other hand, only supports the PPTP, IKEv2/IPSec and OpenVPN protocol on all of its devices. As a default, all of its apps use OpenVPN.

For encryption on Windows and Android, it uses AES-256-GCM coupled with SHA-256 authentication and the strongest 4096-bit RSA key for handshaking.

On Mac and iOS, HMA uses the same Galois Counter Mode cipher, but with IKEV2/IPSec, as to give users better speeds and performance.

In terms of privacy, deciding the winner is actually an easy task. PureVPN has its headquarters in the safe, Hong Kong, whereas HMA VPN is based in the UK.

As you probably know, UK is a founding member of the Five Eyes Alliance, which indulges in intelligence sharing by imposing mandatory mass surveillance and data retention laws.

Therefore, it may not be a good option exactly to sign up with HMA, despite them claiming to be a “zero logs” provider. They will have to comply with their country’s laws!

This has been verified in two circumstances; one involving a case of harassment, leading to the arrest of the perpetrator after HMA handed over logs.

In another case, HMA revealed the personal details of one of its customers, Cody Kretsinger, a member accused of hacking Sony Pictures.

Where PureVPN supports a shared/static network infrastructure, HMA VPN sticks to the traditional shared only system of IP addresses.

This is quite problematic, as static IPs serve an important purpose in the VPN industry. They allow users to access sensitive banking information and access their LAN networks.

Luckily for you, PureVPN has static IPs in 8+ countries. These include the US, UK, Australia, Canada, Germany, Malta, Hong Kong, Singapore.

PureVPN and HMA VPN both offer good support through multiple channels. These include ticketing, email, live chat, FAQs, knowledgebase, and video guides.

Since email support is still the go-to option for many, I conducted a small test for their response times. This was just to see how proactive their customer representatives are. In case you want to cancel PureVPN subscription for any reason their customer support team is available to assist you for that.

Below you can see the stats of both providers on the basis of four different questions. Typically, PureVPN has an average response time of 39 minutes and HMA 30 minutes!